tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6469704299235308349.post5454316247241901674..comments2024-02-09T16:24:46.087+11:00Comments on -ck hacking: 3.0.0-ck1 and BFS for 3.0.0ckhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02904761195451530213noreply@blogger.comBlogger67125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6469704299235308349.post-7165115685501778412013-02-07T17:44:58.141+11:002013-02-07T17:44:58.141+11:00Is this patch available somewhere? It's needed...Is this patch available somewhere? It's needed for a custom kernel for an Android device. Newer kernels don't work on the device as of now.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15117535776246962593noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6469704299235308349.post-667900630898078862011-10-19T08:36:08.418+11:002011-10-19T08:36:08.418+11:00nevermind, got it here http://ck.kolivas.org/patch...nevermind, got it here http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/3.0/patch-3.0.0-ck1.gzchronniffhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16926752650876677664noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6469704299235308349.post-35777944457977572982011-10-19T08:32:21.897+11:002011-10-19T08:32:21.897+11:00me too, I need this ck patch too, is there anywher...me too, I need this ck patch too, is there anywhere else I can find it?chronniffhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16926752650876677664noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6469704299235308349.post-50056442836357974092011-10-02T07:26:43.594+11:002011-10-02T07:26:43.594+11:00hi all
I need patch-3.0.0-ck1.bz2 but kernel.org i...hi all<br />I need patch-3.0.0-ck1.bz2 but kernel.org is down, where can i download it?<br />thanksermesnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6469704299235308349.post-30196680479576907952011-09-20T14:10:52.034+10:002011-09-20T14:10:52.034+10:00Indeed apology was sarcasm, but I was going to get...Indeed apology was sarcasm, but I was going to get around to it, eventually.ckhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02904761195451530213noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6469704299235308349.post-34593470277352532902011-09-17T11:46:33.492+10:002011-09-17T11:46:33.492+10:00Yes, I tried too :(
no have case,
I still use defa...Yes, I tried too :(<br />no have case,<br />I still use default config :/<br />Thanks my friend.L.J.Marínhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02742288129387232380noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6469704299235308349.post-52131745768436542862011-09-15T04:29:22.427+10:002011-09-15T04:29:22.427+10:00Did you remember to do "make oldconfig" ...Did you remember to do "make oldconfig" after applying the BFS patch?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11469174621439712081noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6469704299235308349.post-58074085934925869072011-09-14T11:44:16.126+10:002011-09-14T11:44:16.126+10:00@RealNC :P
I've learned,
the problem is, the ...@RealNC :P<br /><br />I've learned,<br />the problem is, the last kernel (2.6) work very fine,<br />now, 3.0 not work very fine,<br />is the same config :)L.J.Marínhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02742288129387232380noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6469704299235308349.post-9702237272529085312011-09-11T20:26:36.807+10:002011-09-11T20:26:36.807+10:00@L.J.Marín
BFS has nothing to do with this. You sh...@L.J.Marín<br />BFS has nothing to do with this. You should learn how to build kernels :-PAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11469174621439712081noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6469704299235308349.post-40344293404518962482011-09-11T08:24:09.011+10:002011-09-11T08:24:09.011+10:00@CK: Hi,
I use debian/testing, i used the new ker...@CK: Hi,<br /><br />I use debian/testing, i used the new kernel 3.0 with the patch -ck.<br /><br />The kernel result is a very big, 2GB +o- compare to 700mb +o-<br /><br />The initrd is very big too, 90mb compare to 9mb.<br /><br />Any idea for this?L.J.Marínhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02742288129387232380noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6469704299235308349.post-19939143403248067012011-09-10T13:14:54.137+10:002011-09-10T13:14:54.137+10:00Apology accepted.Apology accepted.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6469704299235308349.post-68193875183763486602011-09-10T07:25:41.825+10:002011-09-10T07:25:41.825+10:00The long longs are absolutely necessary and the in...The long longs are absolutely necessary and the ints are the same size as the longs. "Does not excuse the bad practice" - well excuse me for coding my brain fuck scheduler with bad practice.ckhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02904761195451530213noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6469704299235308349.post-61790609990564295502011-09-10T03:34:05.824+10:002011-09-10T03:34:05.824+10:00I still think that BFS abuses long and long long.
...I still think that BFS abuses long and long long.<br /><br />C99 6.2.5 (5) does explicitly say that int is the natural type for a given architecture.<br /><br />This is worth cleaning. There are patches posted in another thread that begin to address this.<br /><br />The fact that long happens to be equal to int does not excuse the bad practice.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6469704299235308349.post-36125453117432029902011-09-10T02:29:53.873+10:002011-09-10T02:29:53.873+10:00"Int is the most natural integer for a given ..."Int is the most natural integer for a given arch and is tied to word."<br /><br />Not really. Neither the C nor C++ standards say anything about it. As a result, it's compiler-specific as well as system specific. GCC on Intel x86-64 has a 32-bit int while the native word size is 64-bit (long). Other compilers and GCC on other architectures can (and do) behave differently.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11469174621439712081noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6469704299235308349.post-42532657203136333522011-09-09T23:12:43.046+10:002011-09-09T23:12:43.046+10:00Int is the most natural integer for a given arch a...Int is the most natural integer for a given arch and is tied to word. Long simply happens to be equal to int on 32/64 bit. <br /><br />There is neither a need to rely on the happenstance nor any benefit.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6469704299235308349.post-24582877158708103702011-09-09T13:44:42.492+10:002011-09-09T13:44:42.492+10:00What the heck are you talking about? Linux only ru...What the heck are you talking about? Linux only runs on 32 and 64 bit platforms and long and int are the same size on 32bits. They're only different on 64 bit platforms and there is zero speed advantage to int over long, just slight size difference.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6469704299235308349.post-31640675806095893342011-09-09T03:37:33.870+10:002011-09-09T03:37:33.870+10:0016-bit arches would crawl. Let me put the question...16-bit arches would crawl. Let me put the question differently. What's the realistic range of numbers BFS explores while using long. I know that number of CPUs is proclaimed to be less than 4092. :)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6469704299235308349.post-77917157115516712492011-09-07T23:38:44.140+10:002011-09-07T23:38:44.140+10:00Guaranteed it would not make a difference measurab...Guaranteed it would not make a difference measurable by any means on the planet.ckhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02904761195451530213noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6469704299235308349.post-43010236040045520662011-09-07T23:35:22.743+10:002011-09-07T23:35:22.743+10:00Any plans to tidy up usage of long and int if that...Any plans to tidy up usage of long and int if that's beneficial on less powerful CPU's?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6469704299235308349.post-49728887980178926232011-09-05T20:26:19.938+10:002011-09-05T20:26:19.938+10:00And this is the patch if you want to try:
http://...And this is the patch if you want to try:<br /><br />http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=patch;h=4508378b9523e22a2a0175d8bf64d932fb10a67d;hp=1af8efe965676ab30d6c8a5b1fccc9229f339a3bAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11469174621439712081noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6469704299235308349.post-88366468641985063272011-09-05T02:56:59.475+10:002011-09-05T02:56:59.475+10:00people with small freezes (kernel 3.0.x), maybe re...people with small freezes (kernel 3.0.x), maybe related to https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40262Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6469704299235308349.post-17671120187082198012011-08-31T22:37:30.693+10:002011-08-31T22:37:30.693+10:00@Anonymous: Where did I write that? I don't se...@Anonymous: Where did I write that? I don't see it with CFS on 3.0. <br /><br />I said I see it on pure kernel patched with BFS patch _only_, without the additional 3.0 -ck patches.karabaja4noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6469704299235308349.post-47920740257169429672011-08-31T21:13:11.073+10:002011-08-31T21:13:11.073+10:00@karabaja4: You see the same bug with pure 3.0. So...@karabaja4: You see the same bug with pure 3.0. So how is it a BFS problem?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6469704299235308349.post-26131263043113030062011-08-30T09:49:00.385+10:002011-08-30T09:49:00.385+10:00@CK: not using DE (just plain Openbox WM), I have ...@CK: not using DE (just plain Openbox WM), I have compositing disabled.karabaja4noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6469704299235308349.post-53997838423238304172011-08-30T08:01:40.377+10:002011-08-30T08:01:40.377+10:00@karabaja4: Are you running kde? Perhaps you'r...@karabaja4: Are you running kde? Perhaps you're running into the kde + compositing + nvidia issue? It hits far more frequently on BFS than mainline. If so, try a different desktop environment?ckhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02904761195451530213noreply@blogger.com