tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6469704299235308349.post6100631276531137068..comments2024-02-09T16:24:46.087+11:00Comments on -ck hacking: MuQSS - The Multiple Queue Skiplist Scheduler v0.105ckhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02904761195451530213noreply@blogger.comBlogger12125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6469704299235308349.post-75002538060637587642016-10-05T22:41:32.288+11:002016-10-05T22:41:32.288+11:00Ok I've finished testing muqss105. The results...Ok I've finished testing muqss105. The results are here as usual:<br />https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ZfXUfcP2fBpQA6LLb-DP6xyDgPdFYZMwJdE0SQ6y3Xg/edit?usp=sharing<br /><br />Nothing new to see, it was more to put some stress on the system to see if it triggers errors.<br />And indeed I got an error related to an xfs process:<br />http://pastebin.com/mQpC1dMx<br />I can't reproduce it though, and I'm not shure it's muqss related. I will wait for linux 4.8.1 and try linux 4.7 + muqss106 in the meantime.<br /><br />PedroAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6469704299235308349.post-49475540577403080042016-10-05T09:08:42.783+11:002016-10-05T09:08:42.783+11:00He/she most likely wants the actual fixes on top o...He/she most likely wants the actual fixes on top of BFS512.<br />Maybe, its worth to try:<br />http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/bfs/4.0/4.8/Pending/bfs512-fixes.patch<br />even if they're announced as kernel 4.8 related. So, YMMV applies.<br />My suggestion: Try MuQSS instead!<br /><br />BR, Manuel KrauseAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6469704299235308349.post-81873462997756627182016-10-05T08:15:50.429+11:002016-10-05T08:15:50.429+11:00Does the newly uploaded bfs512-muqss105.patch appl...Does the newly uploaded bfs512-muqss105.patch apply to the 4.8 for you? I am still experiencing errors.grayskyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16133632514577609343noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6469704299235308349.post-82991571363590777382016-10-05T08:05:14.775+11:002016-10-05T08:05:14.775+11:00I've reuploaded a fresh diff from bfs512 to mu...I've reuploaded a fresh diff from bfs512 to muqss 105.ckhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02904761195451530213noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6469704299235308349.post-13430453585291835922016-10-05T07:45:16.438+11:002016-10-05T07:45:16.438+11:00Sure, I've added to the pending/ directory for...Sure, I've added to the pending/ directory for 4.7. There are now 5 patches for 4.7 bfs502.ckhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02904761195451530213noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6469704299235308349.post-90707594291370002622016-10-05T07:35:45.077+11:002016-10-05T07:35:45.077+11:004.8-sched-MuQSS_105.patch applies cleanly but bfs5...4.8-sched-MuQSS_105.patch applies cleanly but bfs512-muqss105.patch does not apply to either the 4.8 code or the 4.8-sched-MuQSS_105 patched code.grayskyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16133632514577609343noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6469704299235308349.post-18376645488183047442016-10-05T07:22:44.498+11:002016-10-05T07:22:44.498+11:00I probably just diffed them wrong. In any case all...I probably just diffed them wrong. In any case all it is is a diff from bfs512 to muqss 105. Nothing is left from the bfs.ckhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02904761195451530213noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6469704299235308349.post-50218181113969231582016-10-05T06:43:16.033+11:002016-10-05T06:43:16.033+11:00Although I trust your workflow control, can it be ...Although I trust your workflow control, can it be that you used an incremental BFS512-to-MuQSS patch without the prerequisite? I cannot verify from here, what may be wrong (no 4.8 on here yet).<br />Maybe you'd try the full patch instead:<br />http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/muqss/4.0/4.8/4.8-sched-MuQSS_105.patch<br /><br />BR, Manuel KrauseAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6469704299235308349.post-80704165925212680692016-10-05T06:05:46.697+11:002016-10-05T06:05:46.697+11:00Thanks for the fixes Con.
However I still have err...Thanks for the fixes Con.<br />However I still have errors related to xfs processes in the log with linux 4.8 + bfs512 + bfs512-fixes.<br />http://pastebin.com/5jfSK9qY<br />It seems to happen randomly when I stress the cpu. It doesn't happen on cfs, but maybe it's because the test duration is only 2-3hours.<br />I'm testing muqss105 now.<br /><br />Pedro<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6469704299235308349.post-39262399514772837142016-10-05T05:43:22.582+11:002016-10-05T05:43:22.582+11:00I must not be applying the patch to 4.8 correctly:...I must not be applying the patch to 4.8 correctly:<br />https://gist.github.com/anonymous/ede811fe36320eb1bf3f603b721a6143grayskyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16133632514577609343noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6469704299235308349.post-34692138883761021062016-10-05T05:40:26.426+11:002016-10-05T05:40:26.426+11:00Con, thank you for your bug-fixing efforts!
The 1...Con, thank you for your bug-fixing efforts! <br />The 105 version, still kernel 4.7.6, solves two issues I've had with 104 +first 2 pending patches: failing to reboot properly and failing to suspend to disk.<br />Both are solved now and overall behaviour is in a very good shape. :-)<br />Heavy and very good work, "chapeau!" :-)))<br /><br />BR, Manuel KrauseAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6469704299235308349.post-66245537907776831372016-10-05T02:00:16.080+11:002016-10-05T02:00:16.080+11:00Hey,
is it also possible to integrate the latest ...Hey,<br /><br />is it also possible to integrate the latest fixes for BFS512 to linux 4.7?<br /><br />Thank YouAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com